There’s a huge debate that has waged for ages among the
literary elite, much like the way politicians today bicker about policy, where
both sides believe their opinions and stances are the best. One side argues that to be deemed ‘original’,
a writer must write something, (a concept, an idea, an illustration) that has
never been done before, and the other side argues that there’s nothing wrong
with taking an established idea (formula, event, story foundation.) and write
it better, making it an original work.
I find they both are correct. There have been many great stories with an original
concept that were well written, but through years of advanced technology, broader
wisdom, easier access to information and study, that same story – mixed with
this new information and technology, can be transformed into a new work. This new story would be classified as original,
because it (in its entirety) hasn’t been written before.
I like both concepts.
I’ve used both; sometimes within the same body of work.
Don’t let those who are follow the idea of one or the other change what you desire for your
story. It’s YOUR story, write it the way
you want it – and let everyone else
worry about their own works.
Till next time,
~T.L. Gray
No comments:
Post a Comment